Portrait of Kyle Sandilands

Photo: Eva Rinaldi · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Born in Australia · Nationality Australian — Culture / media / celebrities

Kyle Sandilands

Documented profile covering 11 controversies, including “Lie-detector interview with 14-year-old girl who disclosed rape” and “Remarks about Magda Szubanski and concentration camp comparison”.

Are you concerned? Right of reply

Profile No. 0851 · Updated on 12 October 2026

Portrait of Kyle Sandilands

Photo: Eva Rinaldi · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons

11Documented controversies
21Sources
0Formal charge · all time
0Conviction

I. Documented controversies

01

2024–2026

Series of sexually explicit broadcasts in 2024: ACMA breaches and strengthened licence conditions for five years

Civil / administrative proceedings

Five ACMA investigations into programmes broadcast between June and December 2024 resulted in repeated findings of highly offensive content or strong, explicit sexual references. In March 2026, ACMA imposed additional conditions on ARN licence holders for five years in relation to programmes hosted by Sandilands and/or Jackie O.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Direct responsibility

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    Australian Communications and Media Authorityacma.gov.auRegulatory authorityVery high reliability
  2. [2]
    Australian Communications and Media Authorityacma.gov.auRegulatory authorityVery high reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

02

2025–2026

Split with Jackie O and ARN: 'serious misconduct', disputed dismissal and 12,09 M AUD settlement

Civil / administrative proceedings

Following the deterioration of his professional relationship with Jackie O Henderson and an on-air confrontation on 20 February 2026, ARN characterised Sandilands' behaviour as 'serious misconduct', then terminated his contract and that of his company Quasar Media. Sandilands challenged the process. In June 2026, the parties reached a comprehensive settlement including 12,09 million Australian dollars and advertising support for his new venture.

Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 4

  1. [1]
    ARN Mediaarn.com.auCompany documentVery high reliability
  2. [2]
    ARN Mediaarn.com.auCompany documentVery high reliability
  3. [3]
    ASX / ARN Mediaannouncements.asx.com.auVery high reliability
  4. [4]
    ABC Newsabc.net.auMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

03

2026-09

Promotion of Mosh and telehealth weight-loss treatments: criticism from doctors

No legal proceedings

Sandilands was criticised by doctors for a campaign promoting Mosh, a telehealth platform offering, among other services, medication-based weight-loss treatments. Criticism centred on celebrity influence, remote assessments and the risk of normalising prescription medications.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Herald Sunheraldsun.com.auMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

04

2021; décision 2023

Mocking remarks about Paralympians and threat against journalist: two ACMA breaches

Civil / administrative proceedings

During a programme about the Tokyo Paralympic Games, Sandilands made remarks deemed mocking and degrading towards athletes with disabilities. Two days later, a segment concerning criticism of the programme contained a threat against a named journalist. ACMA found breaches of decency rules in both segments.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Australian Communications and Media Authorityacma.gov.auRegulatory authorityVery high reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

05

2022; décision 2023-08

Remarks about mpox and gay men: breach of decency rules according to ACMA

Civil / administrative proceedings

In a segment about mpox, Sandilands made remarks stereotyping gay men and collectively attributing responsibility for spreading the virus to them. ACMA concluded that the segment breached decency rules.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Australian Communications and Media Authorityacma.gov.auRegulatory authorityVery high reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

06

2022-10

Insults targeting colleagues and use of ableist terms: apologies and advertiser concern

No legal proceedings

Sandilands used insults and ableist terms on air concerning colleagues or industry competitors. The segment prompted criticism and concern among some advertisers.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Personally implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    The Guardiantheguardian.comMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

07

2019-09

Vulgar remarks about Virgin Mary: interfaith protests and lengthy on-air apology

Protagonist not prosecuted

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

Sandilands made sexually explicit and mocking remarks about the Virgin Mary. Christian and Muslim leaders condemned the comments, demonstrations took place outside the station, and Sandilands subsequently delivered a lengthy series of on-air apologies.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Personally implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    The Guardiantheguardian.comMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

08

2014-08

Intrusive questions to Erin Molan about alleged breast surgery

No legal proceedings

Sandilands and his programme repeatedly questioned sports journalist Erin Molan about an alleged breast enlargement. The segment was widely criticised as sexist and intrusive; Molan left her regular segment shortly afterwards.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    The Guardiantheguardian.comMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

09

2011–2012

Insults and threat against journalist: advertisers withdraw and ACMA finds code breach

Civil / administrative proceedings

After a journalist criticised a television programme, Sandilands insulted her on air in sexist terms and said he would 'hunt her down'. Several advertisers withdrew their advertising, and ACMA subsequently found the remarks deeply degrading and contrary to decency standards.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Personally implicated

Sources · 3

  1. [1]
    ABC Newsabc.net.auMediaHigh reliability
  2. [2]
    ABC Newsabc.net.auMediaHigh reliability
  3. [3]
    ABC Radio Nationalabc.net.auMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

10

2009-07/12

Lie-detector interview with 14-year-old girl who disclosed rape

No legal proceedings

During a segment using a fake lie detector, a 14-year-old girl disclosed that she had been raped. The way the programme continued questioning her provoked national outrage. Sandilands and Jackie O were suspended, Network Ten dismissed Sandilands from his role on Australian Idol, and ACMA subsequently found a breach of the broadcasting code.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 4

  1. [1]
    ABC Newsabc.net.auMediaHigh reliability
  2. [2]
    ABC Newsabc.net.auMediaHigh reliability
  3. [3]
    ABC Newsabc.net.auMediaHigh reliability
  4. [4]
    ABC Newsabc.net.auMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

11

2009-09

Remarks about Magda Szubanski and concentration camp comparison

Civil / administrative proceedings

Sandilands attacked Magda Szubanski's weight and used a concentration camp comparison. The remark triggered another controversy a few weeks after the lie-detector incident.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Personally implicated

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    ABC Newsabc.net.auMediaHigh reliability
  2. [2]
    ABC Newsabc.net.auMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 3 September 2026

Add to this entry

II. Constellation of documented links

No documented link with another published profile for now.

Two profiles are linked when a documented controversy of one names the other. The link points to that controversy and its sources; it does not indicate a personal relationship.

III. Has something changed?

A new court decision, a missing source, a mistake? Tell us what should be updated: every request is read by the editorial team.

iPhone and iPad

Install Controversia

  1. Tap Share
  2. then Add to Home Screen

Tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.