Photo: ©House of Lords / photography by Roger Harris · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Born in United Kingdom · Nationality British — Politics / institutions

David Steel

Former British Liberal Party leader and sponsor of the bill that became the Abortion Act 1967.

Documented profile covering 6 controversies, including “Cyril Smith in 1979: failure to act after concluding abuse allegations were probably substantiated” and “Subsequent recommendation of Cyril Smith for knighthood despite known suspicions”.

Are you concerned? Right of reply

Profile No. 0972 · Updated on 12 October 2026

6Documented controversies

11Sources

0Formal charge · all time

0Conviction

§ Legal statuses reflect the documented sources as of the date shown; they replace neither court decisions nor the presumption of innocence. Counts are not a rating. Methodology

I. Documented controversies

2020-02-25

2020 IICSA report: severe criticism, departure from Liberal Democrats and retirement from House of Lords

No legal proceedings

He disputed aspects of the interpretation of his conduct and pointed out that he had answered the inquiry openly. The report delivered major official criticism of leadership and child protection but did not convict Steel of a criminal offence.

State of the evidence: Documented
Attribution: Directly implicated

Sources · 3

[1]
The GuardianDavid Steel quits Lib Dems after child abuse inquiry reportMediaHigh reliability
[2]
The GuardianPolice and politicians ‘turned blind eye’ to Westminster child abuse claimsMediaHigh reliability
[3]
IICSAExecutive Summary — Westminster investigationOfficial documentVery high reliability

Last verified: 6 September 2026

Add to this entry

2019-03-14–2019-05-14

2019 Liberal Democrat suspension following Cyril Smith testimony, then internal dismissal of case in his favour

Investigation

Two months later, the party's Scottish executive concluded that there were no grounds for action against him and lifted the suspension. Steel stated that the party had 'cleared my name'. This favourable internal outcome must be distinguished from the subsequent independent IICSA findings in 2020.

State of the evidence: Documented
Attribution: Directly implicated

Sources · 2

[1]
The GuardianDavid Steel suspended from Lib Dems over Cyril Smith revelationMediaHigh reliability
[2]
The GuardianLib Dems clear Lord Steel over Cyril Smith abuse claimsMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 6 September 2026

Add to this entry

2014-01–2014-01-26

Rennard affair: public intervention calling for a 'sense of proportion' following allegations of inappropriate sexual behaviour

No legal proceedings

He pointed out that police had not prosecuted and the internal investigation had not reached a finding beyond reasonable doubt, while considering that an apology for making women uncomfortable could be appropriate. His remarks drew criticism for minimising the issue; no personal wrongdoing by Steel is alleged in the Rennard case.

State of the evidence: Documented
Attribution: Personally implicated

Sources · 2

[1]
The GuardianThe Lord Rennard case cries out for a sense of proportionHigh reliability
[2]
The GuardianLord Rennard row is damaging Liberal Democrats – David SteelMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 6 September 2026

Add to this entry

années 1980–1988

Subsequent recommendation of Cyril Smith for knighthood despite known suspicions

No legal proceedings

The IICSA indicated that, had this information been passed on, the committee might have assessed the nomination differently. Steel said he had seen no reason to confront Smith again; the inquiry explicitly responded that he had 'every reason' to do so. The status is a public inquiry finding, not an adjudicated criminal offence.

State of the evidence: Documented
Attribution: Direct responsibility

Sources · 1

[1]
IICSAE.2: The Liberal Party and Sir Cyril SmithOfficial documentVery high reliability

Last verified: 6 September 2026

Add to this entry

1979

Cyril Smith in 1979: failure to act after concluding abuse allegations were probably substantiated

No legal proceedings

Steel explained that the alleged conduct predated Smith's membership of the Liberal Party and that he did not consider himself empowered to reopen the matter. The IICSA rejected that justification, finding that he had neglected the risk Smith might still pose to children and prioritised political convenience. The report does not constitute a personal criminal conviction of Steel.

State of the evidence: Documented
Attribution: Direct responsibility

Sources · 2

[1]
IICSAExecutive Summary — Westminster investigationOfficial documentVery high reliability
[2]
IICSAE.2: The Liberal Party and Sir Cyril SmithOfficial documentVery high reliability

Last verified: 6 September 2026

Add to this entry

1966–1967-10-27

Abortion Act 1967: sponsor of historic reform remaining at centre of political and moral controversy

No legal proceedings

The law immediately prompted lasting opposition and repeated attempts to restrict it. Steel continued to defend it for decades while expressing openness to reviewing the upper time limit as foetal viability evolved. The event is a controversial legislative decision of historical interest, not a matter of integrity.

State of the evidence: Documented
Attribution: Directly implicated

Sources · 3

[1]
The GuardianFifty years on, the Abortion Act should be celebrated – and updatedMediaHigh reliability
[2]
The GuardianWe need to rethink my abortion lawHigh reliability
[3]
The GuardianThe one that won't go awayMediaHigh reliability

Last verified: 6 September 2026

Add to this entry

II. Constellation of documented links

No documented link with another published profile for now.

Two profiles are linked when a documented controversy of one names the other. The link points to that controversy and its sources; it does not indicate a personal relationship.

III. Has something changed?

A new court decision, a missing source, a mistake? Tell us what should be updated: every request is read by the editorial team.