Portrait of Jamie Dimon

Photo: Steve Jurvetson · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Born in United States · Nationality American — Finance

Jamie Dimon

Documented profile covering 25 controversies, including “1998: departure from Citigroup following power struggle with Sandy Weill and management tensions” and “March 2008: Bear Stearns acquisition with nearly $30 billion Fed facility — debate over public bailout”.

Are you concerned? Right of reply

Profile No. 1281 · Updated on 12 October 2026

Portrait of Jamie Dimon

Photo: Steve Jurvetson · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons

25Documented controversies+ 1 background event
45Sources
0Formal charge · all time
0Conviction

I. Documented controversies

01

2021–2026

2021–2026: acquisition of Frank for $175 million based on fraudulently inflated user figures — Dimon acknowledges "huge mistake"

Allegations

JPMorgan acquired fintech company Frank for $175 million. Authorities subsequently accused its founder Charlie Javice of fabricating data suggesting 4.25 million users when the company had fewer than 300,000. Dimon publicly described the acquisition as a "huge mistake"; the episode also prompted scrutiny of JPMorgan's acquisition due diligence.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Protagonist is the victim

Sources · 3

  1. [1]
    U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC Charges Founder of Frank with Fraud in Connection with $175 Million SaleRegulatory authorityHigh reliability
  2. [2]
    U.S. Department of JusticeFormer Start-Up CEO Charged In $175 Million FraudOfficial documentHigh reliability
  3. [3]

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

02

2026-01-22–2026-09-10

January–September 2026: Donald Trump sues JPMorgan and Dimon for $5 billion alleging political "debanking"

Civil / administrative proceedings

Donald Trump and related entities sued JPMorgan Chase and Jamie Dimon in Florida for $5 billion, alleging that account closures after 2021 were politically motivated and that Dimon had participated in a blacklisting mechanism. The case became a prominent example in the US debate over "debanking".

State of the evidence
Allegations
Attribution
Accused

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

03

2026-07-13

July 2026: Elizabeth Warren asks whether Dimon may have conveyed ideas attributed to Jeffrey Epstein in the United Kingdom

No legal proceedings

Following publication of documents describing a 2009 exchange concerning the British tax on bonuses, Senator Elizabeth Warren asked Dimon whether he might have lobbied the British government by following, directly or indirectly, an idea attributed to Epstein.

State of the evidence
Reported by the press
Attribution
Directly implicated

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

04

2026-09-09–2026-09-10

September 2026: lobbying against higher British bank taxes and pressure surrounding future Canary Wharf headquarters

No legal proceedings

Dimon met British Prime Minister Andy Burnham and Chancellor John Healey amid concerns that the budget would raise bank taxes. He warned that an increase could reduce investment and employment and again linked the issue to London's attractiveness and JPMorgan's planned Canary Wharf headquarters, estimated to cost approximately £3 billion.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Direct responsibility

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

05

2025-01–2025-02-13

January–February 2025: five-day office return policy and blunt rejection of internal petition

No legal proceedings

JPMorgan required a large proportion of employees to return to the office five days a week. At a town hall meeting, Dimon bluntly rejected an internal petition seeking greater flexibility and emphasised efficiency and managerial accountability.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Direct responsibility

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

06

2024-03–2024-05

March–May 2024: major transaction surveillance gaps — approximately $450 million in coordinated regulatory penalties

Civil / administrative proceedings — against a third party

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

US regulators found that JPMorgan had failed to properly monitor billions of trading instances across at least thirty global platforms. The OCC imposed $250 million, the Fed a coordinated penalty and the CFTC $200 million with crediting arrangements, for an aggregate cost of approximately $450 million according to the bank's subsequent disclosures.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 3

  1. [1]
    Office of the Comptroller of the CurrencyOCC Assesses $250 Million Civil Money Penalty Related to Bank's Trade Surveillance ProgramRegulatory authorityHigh reliability
  2. [2]
    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCFTC Orders J.P. Morgan to Pay $200 Million for Supervision FailuresRegulatory authorityHigh reliability
  3. [3]

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

07

2008–2023-09

2008–2023: retaining Jeffrey Epstein as a client, Dimon's deposition and $290 million and $75 million settlements

Protagonist not prosecuted

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

JPMorgan retained Jeffrey Epstein as a client until 2013, several years after his 2008 conviction, despite internal warning signs revealed in subsequent litigation. In 2023, Dimon gave evidence under oath in a deposition. The bank subsequently reached a settlement of approximately $290 million with a class of victims and another of $75 million with the US Virgin Islands.

State of the evidence
Settlement
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

08

2023-08-09

August 2023: shareholder derivative action personally naming Dimon and board in Epstein case — dismissed on procedural grounds

Civil / administrative proceedings

Shareholder pension funds sued Dimon and several directors, alleging insufficient oversight of JPMorgan's relationship with Epstein. A federal judge dismissed the action.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Accused

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

09

2021-07–2022-05-17

2021–2022: exceptional stock option award valued at $52.6 million and overwhelming shareholder rejection of executive pay

No legal proceedings

JPMorgan's board awarded Dimon a special stock option grant valued at approximately $52.6 million to encourage him to remain for several years. In May 2022, only 31 % of votes cast approved executive remuneration, an unusually strong rebuke.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Personally implicated

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    Reuters / MarketScreenerJPMorgan shareholders vote disapproval of CEO Dimon's special payoutNews agencyHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

10

2015–2021-12-17

December 2021: WhatsApp, texts and personal emails — $200 million in penalties for deficient communications record-keeping

Protagonist not prosecuted

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

The SEC and CFTC found widespread and prolonged use of text messages, WhatsApp and personal email accounts for business activities, including by senior employees, without compliant record retention. JPMorgan admitted the facts and paid $125 million to the SEC and $75 million to the CFTC.

State of the evidence
Admitted by the person
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionJPMorgan Admits to Widespread Recordkeeping Failures and Agrees to Pay $125 Million PenaltyRegulatory authorityHigh reliability
  2. [2]
    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCFTC Orders JPMorgan to Pay $75 Million for Widespread Use of Unapproved Communication MethodsRegulatory authorityHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

11

2021-11-23–2021-11-24

November 2021: joke that JPMorgan would outlast the Chinese Communist Party, followed by swift apology

No legal proceedings

At an event in the United States, Dimon joked that JPMorgan and the Chinese Communist Party were both celebrating their centenary and that he would bet his bank would last longer. The remark created diplomatic and commercial risks as JPMorgan expanded its activities in China.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Personally implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

12

2008–2020-09-29

2008–2020: precious metals and Treasuries spoofing — criminal and regulatory settlement exceeding $920 million

Protagonist not prosecuted

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

The DOJ, CFTC and SEC penalised JPMorgan over manipulation and spoofing schemes spanning at least eight years, involving hundreds of thousands of deceptive orders in precious metals and Treasury markets. The overall settlement exceeded $920 million and included a deferred prosecution agreement.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 3

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCFTC Orders JPMorgan to Pay Record $920 Million for Spoofing and ManipulationRegulatory authorityHigh reliability
  3. [3]
    U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionJ.P. Morgan Securities Admits to Manipulative Trading in U.S. TreasuriesRegulatory authorityHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

13

2020-11-24

November 2020: $250 million OCC penalty for inadequate fiduciary controls and deficient conflict-of-interest framework

Civil / administrative proceedings — against a third party

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

The OCC fined JPMorgan Chase Bank $250 million for inadequate internal controls and auditing of its fiduciary activities, finding that the framework intended to prevent conflicts of interest was deficient.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Office of the Comptroller of the CurrencyOCC Assesses $250 Million Civil Money Penalty Against JPMorgan Chase BankRegulatory authorityHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

14

2017-09–2018-01-09

2017–2018: bitcoin described as a "fraud" and threat to dismiss traders, followed by public expression of regret

No legal proceedings

Dimon described bitcoin as a "fraud", predicted that it would end badly and stated that he would immediately dismiss a JPMorgan trader who speculated in it, attracting strong criticism from the cryptocurrency sector while his own bank was exploring blockchain applications.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Personally implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Reuters / Investing.comJPMorgan's Dimon regrets calling bitcoin a 'fraud': FoxNews agencyHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

15

2015-05–2017-01

May 2015–January 2017: JPMorgan Chase & Co. pleads guilty to foreign exchange market conspiracy

Conviction — against a third party

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to manipulate the price of US dollars and euros in the spot foreign exchange market. The Department of Justice described traders coordinating their positions and bids in private chat rooms; the plea was subsequently accepted by the court.

State of the evidence
Established by a court
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    U.S. Department of JusticeFive Major Banks Agree to Parent-Level Guilty PleasOfficial documentHigh reliability
  2. [2]
    U.S. Department of JusticeForeign Currency Exchange Dealer Pleads Guilty to Antitrust ConspiracyOfficial documentHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

16

2017-01-20

January 2017: $53 million settlement over racial and ethnic discrimination in wholesale mortgage lending

Civil / administrative proceedings — against a third party

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

The US government brought and subsequently settled discrimination allegations against JPMorgan Chase concerning lending practices: African-American and Hispanic borrowers allegedly paid higher rates and fees than comparable white borrowers in the wholesale channel.

Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

17

2016-11-17

November 2016: "Sons and Daughters" programme — more than $264 million for FCPA violations and hiring linked to Asian officials

Protagonist not prosecuted

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

US authorities concluded that JPMorgan had used a recruitment programme in Asia involving relatives of public officials and executives of client companies to win or retain business. Combined SEC, DOJ and Fed penalties exceeded $264 million.

State of the evidence
Documented
Legal status — source text
corporate_fCPA_settlement_no_personal_charge_against_dimon
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionJPMorgan Chase Paying $264 Million to Settle FCPA ChargesRegulatory authorityHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

18

2015-03-03

March 2015: further $50 million settlement over robo-signing and improper personal bankruptcy practices

Civil / administrative proceedings — against a third party

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

The US Trustee Program reached a settlement of more than $50 million with JPMorgan Chase over practices in bankruptcy proceedings, including more than 50,000 notices of payment changes signed under penalty of perjury by people who had not verified their accuracy.

Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

19

2015-07-08

July 2015: credit-card debt collection — $136 million in penalties and more than 528,000 accounts abandoned

Civil / administrative proceedings — against a third party

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

The CFPB and states penalised JPMorgan Chase for selling defective credit-card debts and using robo-signed documents. The bank was required to pay at least $50 million in refunds, $136 million in penalties and payments, and cease all collection attempts on more than 528,000 accounts.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Consumer Financial Protection BureauPrepared Remarks on the JPMorgan Chase Debt Collection Enforcement ActionRegulatory authorityHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

20

2014-01-07

January 2014: Madoff case — JPMorgan admits Bank Secrecy Act failings and pays $1.7 billion to victims

Protagonist not prosecuted

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

JPMorgan, Bernard Madoff's longstanding bank, faced criminal allegations concerning two violations of the Bank Secrecy Act and accepted a deferred prosecution agreement involving admissions of fact and $1.7 billion for victims. FinCEN separately found that the bank had failed to report suspicious transactions.

Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    U.S. Department of JusticeJPMorgan criminally charged in connection with Bernard Madoff's Ponzi schemeOfficial documentHigh reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

21

2012-04–2013-10

2012–2013: "London Whale" — Dimon initially downplays affair, losses exceed $6 billion, penalties and bonus halved

No legal proceedings

When initial reports about the Chief Investment Office positions emerged, Dimon described them as a "tempest in a teapot". Losses ultimately exceeded $6 billion. Regulators subsequently penalised JPMorgan for failures in controls, valuation and reporting; the bank admitted certain facts.

State of the evidence
Admitted by the person
Attribution
Direct responsibility

Sources · 3

  1. [1]
    U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionJPMorgan Chase Agrees to Pay $200 Million and Admits Wrongdoing to Settle SEC ChargesRegulatory authorityHigh reliability
  2. [2]
    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCFTC Files and Settles Charges Against JPMorgan for 'London Whale' Swaps TradesRegulatory authorityHigh reliability
  3. [3]
    Reuters / Fox BusinessJPMorgan cuts Dimon's bonus on 'Whale' tradeNews agencyHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

22

2010–2013-07-30

2010–2013: electricity market manipulation by J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy — $410 million FERC settlement

Civil / administrative proceedings — against a third party

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

FERC concluded that a JPMorgan subsidiary had used twelve manipulative bidding strategies in California and Midwestern electricity markets to obtain above-market payments. The settlement included a $285 million penalty and $125 million in disgorgement.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionAll Civil Penalty Actions – 2013: JP Morgan Ventures Energy CorporationRegulatory authorityHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

23

2013-11-19

November 2013: record $13 billion RMBS settlement — JPMorgan acknowledges serious misrepresentations

Civil / administrative proceedings — against a third party

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

JPMorgan reached a $13 billion settlement with US authorities concerning the marketing of mortgage-backed securities by JPMorgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual before 2009. Under the agreement, the bank acknowledged serious misrepresentations to the public concerning several transactions.

State of the evidence
Settlement
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    U.S. Department of JusticeRecord $13 Billion Global Settlement Reached With JPMorgan Over Misleading InvestorsOfficial documentHigh reliability

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

24

2011–2012

2011–2012: foreclosures and "robo-signing" — JPMorgan party to $25 billion national settlement

Civil / administrative proceedings — against a third party

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

JPMorgan was among five major mortgage servicers covered by the $25 billion federal-state settlement concerning mortgage servicing and foreclosure abuses, including robo-signing, defective documentation and lost files. The settlement required payments and new oversight standards.

State of the evidence
Settlement
Attribution
Indirectly implicated
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    U.S. Department of Justice$25 Billion Mortgage Servicing Agreement Filed in Federal CourtOfficial documentHigh reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

25

1998-11

1998: departure from Citigroup following power struggle with Sandy Weill and management tensions

No legal proceedings

Jamie Dimon, then president of Citigroup and long regarded as Sandy Weill's successor, abruptly left the group several weeks after the Citicorp-Travelers merger. Contemporary reports described a power struggle, tensions with other executives and criticism of a management style considered highly controlling.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Direct responsibility

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    The Washington PostClash of corporate cultures shakes Citigroup managementPressHigh reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 10 September 2026

Add to this entry

II. Documented background

Documented biographical or institutional milestones (elections, appointments, foundings, acquisitions…). These are not controversies and are not counted as such.

  1. 2008-03

    March 2008: Bear Stearns acquisition with nearly $30 billion Fed facility — debate over public bailout

    Under Dimon, JPMorgan agreed to acquire Bear Stearns on the brink of collapse in a transaction made possible by a Federal Reserve Bank of New York facility backed by approximately $30 billion in assets. The intervention prompted debate about moral hazard and the use of the public balance sheet to stabilise Wall Street.

    Sources · 2
    1. Federal Reserve Bank of New York — Actions by the New York Fed in Response to Liquidity Pressures in Financial Markets
    2. Forbes — Testimony By JPMorgan's Dimon On Bear Deal

III. Constellation of documented links

  • Linked profile (portrait or initials) — click to open it
  • Line width: number of documented references
  • Hover over or tap a line: controversies and sources

Two profiles are linked when a documented controversy of one names the other. The link points to that controversy and its sources; it does not indicate a personal relationship.

List of documented links (9)
  1. JPMorgan Chase5 documented references
  2. Jeffrey Epstein2 documented references
  3. Sandy Weill2 documented references
  4. Andy Burnham1 documented reference
  5. Bernard Madoff1 documented reference
  6. Charlie Javice1 documented reference
  7. Donald Trump1 documented reference
  8. Elizabeth Warren1 documented reference
  9. Peter Mandelson1 documented reference

IV. Has something changed?

A new court decision, a missing source, a mistake? Tell us what should be updated: every request is read by the editorial team.

iPhone and iPad

Install Controversia

  1. Tap Share
  2. then Add to Home Screen

Tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.