Jan Böhmermann

A 2022 programme suggested problematic links between BSI president Arne Schönbohm and a network associated with Russia. Following his administrative removal, Schönbohm sued ZDF. In 2026, the Higher Regional Court of Munich prohibited several factual claims or impressions but refused financial compensation.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

Police unionist Manuel Ostermann sued ZDF after being described as a 'Herrenmensch' in a Böhmermann programme. In August 2026, the court dismissed the claim, considering the wording permissible in context.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Personally implicated

After an anecdote about approximately 200 bottles of champagne ordered by Maximilian Krah was read on a podcast, Krah sought an injunction. He lost the case; in 2026, a coercive warrant relating to non-payment of legal costs was reported.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Personally implicated

Böhmermann obtained an order from the Regional Court of Cologne against X to prevent the circulation of a fake account using his name, photograph and first-person posts despite its 'Parody' label.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

Berliner Zeitung wrongly attributed the expression 'saure Froschfresse', aimed at Ulf Poschardt, to Böhmermann, although it had been used by Olli Schulz. Böhmermann obtained a favourable ruling, and the newspaper publicly acknowledged its mistake.

Attribution

Directly implicated

Magazin Royale revealed the real identity of the anonymous creator of the political YouTube channel Clownswelt. Critics described the move as doxxing, while ZDF defended the editorial interest in identifying him.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

For the exhibition Die Möglichkeit der Unvernunft at the Haus der Kulturen der Welt, phones and photography were prohibited in exhibition and event spaces. The rule prompted debate over control of images and access to a publicly funded cultural institution.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

As part of his HKW programme, a concert by rapper Chefket was scheduled for 7 October despite allegations of antisemitism against the artist. Following criticism, notably from Jewish and political voices, the concert was cancelled, and Böhmermann subsequently described the choice of date as imprudent.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

Football agent Roger Wittmann sought to prohibit several passages of a programme investigating his activities. After an initial defeat, his appeal also failed before the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

After the programme targeted a beekeeper's marketing practices, Rico Heinzig began selling honey bearing Böhmermann's image. Böhmermann sued the beekeeper, but the Dresden courts considered the advertising response permissible satire.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

Julian Hessenthaler, who was behind the Ibiza video, accused Böhmermann of publicly allowing information to leak following an earlier meeting, thereby compromising his safety. CORRECTIV criticised the handling of source protection.

State of the evidence

Alleged

Attribution

Directly implicated

A programme about Bosnia and Herzegovina and High Representative Christian Schmidt was criticised by specialists and media outlets for errors, omissions and historical or institutional oversimplifications.

State of the evidence

Reported by the press

Attribution

Directly implicated

A programme examining accounts of 'ritual abuse' prompted a formal complaint from the Independent Commission for the Investigation of Child Sexual Abuse. The Television Council upheld a programme complaint, and ZDF removed the episode from its media library.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

The poem targeting Recep Tayyip Erdoğan provoked a diplomatic crisis and the federal government's authorisation of prosecution under the former §103. The criminal investigation was closed, but civil courts prohibited several passages, and the Federal Constitutional Court declined to admit Böhmermann's constitutional complaint.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Personally implicated

ZDF Magazin Royale broadcast a fake RAF-inspired wanted poster depicting several FDP politicians as members of a fictitious gang. The device prompted criticism over trivialising political violence and the limits of satire.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

Böhmermann and FragDenStaat published documents from Hesse's domestic intelligence service relating to the NSU that remained classified. The intelligence agency filed a complaint against persons unknown over the unlawful transmission of the documents.

State of the evidence

Documented

Böhmermann asked the court to prevent Angela Merkel from repeating her description of his poem as deliberately hurtful. The Berlin Administrative Court dismissed the action, notably because there was no concrete risk of repetition.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

Computer Bild had used an image of Böhmermann from Neo Magazin Royale without his consent in an article or promotional campaign concerning a DVB-T2 receiver. After initially winning at first instance, Böhmermann lost before the Higher Regional Court of Cologne on 21 February 2019: the court considered the use permissible given the informational context and the limited interference with his image rights.

Attribution

Protagonist is the complainant

Comedian Oliver Polak accused Böhmermann of crossing an antisemitic line during a sketch and described feeling humiliated. Böhmermann challenged that interpretation and pointed to the rehearsal context and agreement surrounding the sketch.

State of the evidence

Alleged

Attribution

Personally implicated

Böhmermann's team infiltrated RTL's 'Schwiegertochter gesucht' programme using fake contestants to document the production and manipulation methods of the format. The operation prompted debate over both reality television ethics and those of satirical undercover investigations.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

Böhmermann used an iconic photograph of Rostock-Lichtenhagen taken by Martin Langer in a satirical context and subsequently disclosed the photographer's identity during the dispute. Langer invoked his copyright and condemned the personal consequences of this exposure.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated

Böhmermann led people to believe that his team had manipulated the video of Yanis Varoufakis making an offensive hand gesture, before ZDF clarified that this claim was itself a satirical operation. The stunt triggered considerable media confusion.

State of the evidence

Documented

Attribution

Directly implicated