Portrait not available

Crime / sexual exploitation of minors / immigration

Qari Abdul Rauf

Documented profile covering 21 controversies, including “Rochdale: sexual exploitation of minor, conviction and six-year sentence” and “Deprivation of British citizenship upheld after several appeals”.

Are you concerned? Right of reply

Profile No. 1225 · Updated on 12 October 2026

21Documented controversies+ 1 background event
24Sources
1Formal charge · all time1 followed by a conviction
1Conviction

I. Documented controversies

01

January 2025–June 2026

2025–2026: deportation still not publicly confirmed despite adverse decisions

Civil / administrative proceedings

In January 2025, Rochdale's MP asked the Home Office when Rauf and Adil Khan would be deported. The department declined to comment on individual cases while saying it pursued deportations where lawful and possible. In June 2025, LBC reported that Rauf remained in the United Kingdom and that Pakistan refused to readmit him following his renunciation of nationality. In June 2026, further coverage indicated that the Home Office still had not said whether Rauf or Khan had actually been deported.

Attribution
Directly implicated

Last verified: 8 September 2026

Add to this entry

02

2025-10-13

October 2025: House of Lords cites continued presence in Rochdale as example in Article 8 debate

No legal proceedings

During debate on the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, Lord Murray cited Rauf as an example of an offender who had lost his appeals but remained in Rochdale and invoked his renunciation of Pakistani nationality to criticise application of Article 8 of the ECHR.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    UK Parliament / HansardLords Chamber — 13 October 2025Parliamentary recordVery high reliability

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

03

2020–2023

Deportation: family life and Article 8 appeal dismissed through Upper Tribunal

Civil / administrative proceedings

A further deportation decision was made in March 2020. Rauf invoked his family life in the United Kingdom, Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, his nationality status and practical difficulties removing him. His application was rejected in July 2020, the First-tier Tribunal dismissed his appeal in 2022 and, in August 2023, the Upper Tribunal rejected every ground of appeal.

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)UI-2022-006108 — Rauf Qari Abdul v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentCourt decisionVery high reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 8 September 2026

Add to this entry

04

2018-09-24–2023

September 2018: renunciation of Pakistani nationality and statelessness argument

Civil / administrative proceedings

Following loss of his British citizenship, Rauf produced a certificate dated 24 September 2018 indicating renunciation of his Pakistani nationality. He subsequently argued that this prevented his removal to Pakistan.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Personally implicated

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    Upper TribunalRauf Qari Abdul v Secretary of State — UI-2022-006108Court decisionVery high reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

05

2023-08-15

August 2023: Upper Tribunal dismisses appeal on all grounds

Civil / administrative proceedings

The Upper Tribunal dismissed Rauf's appeal against the refusal of his human rights claim, leaving in place the adverse deportation decisions.

State of the evidence
Documented

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Upper TribunalRauf Qari Abdul v Secretary of State — UI-2022-006108Court decisionVery high reliability

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

06

2022-06–2022-10

2022: First-tier Tribunal dismisses deportation appeal despite Article 8 and statelessness arguments

Civil / administrative proceedings

After several hearings, Rauf's appeal against deportation was dismissed. The courts gave very considerable weight to the public interest in removing an offender convicted of serious sexual crimes, despite his arguments concerning family life and nationality.

State of the evidence
Documented

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
  2. [2]

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

07

2021-06–2021-09

2021: specific hearing on statelessness and validity of Pakistani nationality renunciation

Civil / administrative proceedings

During the 2021 hearings, the tribunal had to consider separately whether renouncing Pakistani nationality had genuinely rendered Rauf stateless and prevented his deportation. Expert evidence on Pakistani law was required on the matter.

State of the evidence
Documented

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

08

2019-06–2020-03

2019–2020: presence in Rochdale and intense controversy over failure to remove him after release

No legal proceedings

Several years after his release and the citizenship deprivation proceedings, Rauf was still in Rochdale. Victims and local officials denounced the possibility of encountering their former abusers in the town, fuelling national controversy over the Home Office's failure to implement deportations.

State of the evidence
Reported by the press

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

09

2020-07-20

July 2020: Home Office refuses human rights claim against deportation

Civil / administrative proceedings

On 20 July 2020, the Home Office refused Rauf's human rights claim opposing his removal. The refusal triggered the next series of appeals, which reached the Upper Tribunal.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Upper TribunalRauf Qari Abdul v Secretary of State — UI-2022-006108Court decisionVery high reliability

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

10

2015–2018

Deprivation of British citizenship upheld after several appeals

Civil / administrative proceedings

The Home Office notified Rauf in July 2015 of its intention to deprive him of British citizenship to facilitate possible deportation. A decision followed in December 2015. Following immigration court appeals, the Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal on 8 August 2018. The citizenship deprivation order had been signed on 17 July 2018.

State of the evidence
Documented

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)UI-2022-006108 — Rauf Qari Abdul v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentCourt decisionVery high reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 8 September 2026

Add to this entry

11

2018-08-08

August 2018: Court of Appeal confirms loss of British citizenship

Civil / administrative proceedings

The Court of Appeal dismissed appeals by Qari Abdul Rauf, Adil Khan and Abdul Aziz against deprivation of British citizenship. Judges found that the lower courts had properly balanced the family consequences against the exceptional seriousness of the offences.

State of the evidence
Documented

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

12

2017-02-10

February 2017: Upper Tribunal dismisses appeal against citizenship deprivation

Civil / administrative proceedings

The Upper Tribunal rejected the arguments challenging deprivation of citizenship for Rauf and the other appellants, confirming the Home Secretary's broad discretion in such decisions.

State of the evidence
Documented

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    Upper TribunalAhmed and Others (deprivation of citizenship) [2017] UKUT 118Court decisionVery high reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

13

2016-04

April 2016: First-tier Tribunal upholds citizenship deprivation

Civil / administrative proceedings

The First-tier Tribunal dismissed Rauf's appeal against the new citizenship deprivation decision. It considered, among other things, that the measure was proportionate and would not make him stateless.

State of the evidence
Documented

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

14

2015-07-31–2015-12-02

2015: first citizenship deprivation decision withdrawn then replaced after reconsideration of children's best interests

No legal proceedings

The Home Office initially decided on 31 July 2015 to deprive Rauf of British citizenship. This first decision was withdrawn on 28 October and replaced on 2 December after more explicit consideration of his family circumstances and the best interests of his five minor children.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

Case · 7 documented stages

Rochdale: sexual exploitation of minor, conviction and six-year sentence

Conviction
15

faits 2008–2009; condamnation 2012; libération 2014

Rochdale: sexual exploitation of minor, conviction and six-year sentence

Conviction

Rauf was convicted in the Rochdale case of conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child involving penetration and trafficking for sexual exploitation concerning a 15-year-old girl. Subsequent decisions described sexual relations with the victim in a taxi and a flat, among other acts. He received a total sentence of six years' imprisonment and indefinite sex offender registration. He was released on licence in November 2014 after serving approximately two and a half years.

State of the evidence
Established by a court
Attribution
Accused

Sources · 5

  1. [1]
    Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)Ahmed and Others (deprivation of citizenship) [2017] UKUT 118 (IAC)Court decisionVery high reliability
  2. [2]
    Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)UI-2022-006108 — Rauf Qari Abdul v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentCourt decisionVery high reliability
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    Judiciary of England and WalesHassan and others — sentencing remarksCourt decisionVery high reliability
  5. [5]
    The GuardianRochdale child sex ring: nine men jailedPressHigh reliability

Last verified: 8 September 2026

Add to this entry

16

2014-11

November 2014: released on licence after approximately two and a half years

Conviction

Rauf was released from prison in November 2014 after approximately two years and six months' imprisonment, under the sentence enforcement regime applicable to him.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

17

2013-10-18

October 2013: permission to appeal refused

Conviction

Rauf was among the nine people convicted in Rochdale who were refused permission to appeal their convictions and sentences.

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

18

2012-05-08

May 2012: found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation

Conviction

Following an eleven-week trial at Liverpool Crown Court, Rauf was found guilty of conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child and trafficking for sexual exploitation.

State of the evidence
Established by a court
Attribution
Directly implicated

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

19

2012-05-09

May 2012: six years' imprisonment, indefinite SOA notification and permanent ban on working with children

Conviction

Rauf received six years for trafficking and a concurrent six years for conspiracy, giving an effective sentence of six years. Sex offender notification requirements applied indefinitely; the sentencing remarks also state that an order disqualifying the offenders from working with children was imposed on all those convicted.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Judiciary of England and WalesHassan and others — sentencing remarksCourt decisionVery high reliability

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

20

2009–2011

2009–2011: initial failure to prosecute, followed by case review leading to charges

Formally charged

The Rochdale case initially involved a period when victims' complaints were not prosecuted, partly due to adverse assessments of their credibility. Following prosecution review, charges were eventually brought against Rauf and other men.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Accused

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    The GuardianRochdale gang guilty of exploiting girlsPressHigh reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

21

2011-06-08

June 2011: charged with conspiracy, sexual activity, paying for child's sexual services and trafficking

Conviction

Rauf, then aged 42, was charged with conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with girls under 16, sexual activity, paying for sexual services of a child and trafficking a child within the UK.

Attribution
Accused

Last verified: 9 September 2026

Add to this entry

II. Documented background

Documented biographical or institutional milestones (elections, appointments, foundings, acquisitions…). These are not controversies and are not counted as such.

  1. 2025-01-07–2025-07-17

    January–July 2025: parliamentary pressure and negotiations with Pakistan, without executed deportation

    Rochdale's MP asked the Home Office when Rauf would be deported. The department declined to comment on the individual case. In June and July 2025, Rauf was still reported to be in the United Kingdom while London negotiated with Islamabad and restoration of direct flights was discussed as a possible way to facilitate agreement.

    Sources · 2
    1. UK Parliament — Written question 22399 — Adil Khan and Qari Abdul Rauf: Deportation
    2. LBC — Rochdale grooming gang leaders could be deported under deal with Pakistan

III. Constellation of documented links

  • Linked profile (portrait or initials) — click to open it
  • Line width: number of documented references
  • Hover over or tap a line: controversies and sources

Two profiles are linked when a documented controversy of one names the other. The link points to that controversy and its sources; it does not indicate a personal relationship.

List of documented links (4)
  1. Abdul Aziz2 documented references
  2. Adil Khan2 documented references
  3. Mohammed Amin1 documented reference
  4. Shabir Ahmed1 documented reference

IV. Has something changed?

A new court decision, a missing source, a mistake? Tell us what should be updated: every request is read by the editorial team.

iPhone and iPad

Install Controversia

  1. Tap Share
  2. then Add to Home Screen

Tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.